Jose Statham vs Oliver Anderson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

J. Statham vs O. Anderson

Jose Statham
Jose Statham

Flag NZL NZL

l
l
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
Oliver Anderson
Oliver Anderson

Flag AUS AUS

l
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
w
l

0

Win

0

Played

0

Win

38
Age
27
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
5'9" (175 cm)
861
C. Rank
848
279
Best Rank
639
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$33.5K
Career Money
$22.1K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Statham 0 - 0 Anderson

The last match between Jose Statham and Oliver Anderson was at the Australia F4, 23-03-2015, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory w/o.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Statham0
Anderson0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2Australia F4(03-23-15)

Clay
NZL Flag
Jose Statham
w/o
AUS Flag
Oliver Anderson

J. Statham vs O. Anderson H2H Profile

Stats
$33,515Career Prize Money$22,085
56.68% (607-464)Career Total W/L59.09% (78-54)
12Titles1
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

J. Statham vs O. Anderson Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jose Statham has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Oliver Anderson has won 42.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jose Statham, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Oliver Anderson has won 40.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 32.40% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Jose Statham has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Oliver Anderson has saved 54.41% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Jose Statham has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Oliver Anderson winning 48.15% (W/L 13/14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Jose Statham has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 193/128), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 4/6). Oliver Anderson has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 4/2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 5/4).
  • Player level: In the last year, Jose Statham has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Oliver Anderson has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.15% of matches (W/L 13/14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jose Statham has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Oliver Anderson has played against players with an average rank of 267.63.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jose Statham has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Oliver Anderson has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Jose Statham has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Oliver Anderson has converted 31.25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jose Statham vs Oliver Anderson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Statham 0%, Anderson 52%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Statham 0%, Anderson 51%.
Break Points Saved %: Statham 0%, Anderson 56%.

J. Statham Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardSeoul Challenger - 28-10-2024

Q1

INDM. Sasikumar
L
6-7(3) 6-3 6-4
I.hardTaipei 2 Challenger - 21-10-2024

Q3

KORS. Shin
L
6-4 3-6 6-1

Q1

NZLF. Reynolds
W
6-3 6-3
HardShenzhen Challenger - 14-10-2024

Q3

FRAA. Weber
L
6-4 3-0 ret.

Q1

CHNZ. Dong
W
7-6(7) 6-4

O. Anderson Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardM15 Hua Hin - 20-10-2025

QF

FRAL. Larue
L
4-1 ret.

R2

THAY. Charoenphon
W
6-3 6-3

R1

THAJ. Navasirisomboon
W
6-3 6-4
HardM15 Heraklion - 13-10-2025

R1

SUIA. Casanova
L
6-2 6-3
HardM25 Tamworth - 15-09-2025

R2

AUSP. Marinkov
L
w/o
banner

J. Statham vs O. Anderson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
56.68% (607/464)YTD Win/Loss59.09% (78/54)
55.41% (1367/1100)Sets Win/Loss58.11% (172/124)
52.73% (12351/11071)Games Win/Loss53.92% (1484/1268)
55.68% (387/308)Hard Win/Loss59.57% (56/38)
60.12% (193/128)Clay Win/Loss56.52% (13/10)
51.11% (23/22)Indoor Hard W/L55.56% (5/4)
40.00% (4/6)Grass Win/Loss66.67% (4/2)
0.21Aces Per Game0.15
2366Aces Total204
0.1Double Faults Per Game0.12
1146Total Double Faults158
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
537.49Average Opponent Rank404.83
64% (20760/32455)1st Serve %59% (2897/4934)
71% (14678/20760)1st Serve Win %68% (1968/2897)
52% (6049/11695)2nd Serve Win %50% (1021/2037)
40% (1213/2997)Break Points Won % (Total)41% (225/545)
38% (12383/32662)Return Points Win %41% (2060/5015)
0.00% (0/1)Slam W/L50.00% (1/1)
57.78% (26/19)Cups W/L0% (0/0)
32.35% (11/23)Main Tour W/L66.67% (2/1)
47.66% (183/201)Challenger W/L52.17% (12/11)
63.76% (387/220)Futures W/L60.58% (63/41)
57% (580/1023)Best of 3 Sets Win %61% (78/128)
55% (17/31)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/1)
53% (194/365)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)34% (10/29)
52% (159/305)Deciding Set Win %57% (20/35)
88% (580/511)1st Set Won, Won Match92% (72/66)
12% (580/69)1st Set Won, Lost Match8% (72/6)
19% (489/93)1st Set Lost, Won Match20% (59/12)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Sun, 23 Nov, 10:30 PM
Prediction
ARGF. Ribero
BRAB. Fernandez
W1
2.24
W2
1.56
Sun, 23 Nov, 05:00 PM
Prediction
BRAG. Heide
ARGA. Collarini8
W1
1.34
W2
2.93
Sun, 23 Nov, 01:15 PM
Prediction
PORJ. Graca
ESPC. L. Montagud
W1
5.15
W2
1.121
Sun, 23 Nov, 11:10 AM
Prediction
GBRO. Bonding
FRAM. Bobichon
W1
1.83
W2
1.85
Sun, 23 Nov, 01:30 PM
Prediction
CANK. Stevenson
GBRB. Jones
W1
8.1
W2
1.038
Sun, 23 Nov, 12:00 PM
Prediction
CZED. Kellovsky
KUWE. Qabazard
W1
1.022
W2
9.2